Amica 19.7 Race Report
Monday, July 25, 2011
Two weeks after Rhode Island, it was time to get back racing again at the Amica 19.7 New London. Last year I had a two person support crew but this year was a solo trip. Upon arriving at the site, I was immediately greeted by a brief but strong thunderstorm which delayed the race by about a half hour due to the lightening. Once the storm pulled out we were left with wet and humid conditions with temps in the mid 70s.
Swim – 1/2 mile – 19:39, 2:14/100y (2010 – 14:22, 1:39/100y)
I was hoping for a strong swim and got in a little bit of warm-up before the race. I started again on the outside but towards the front. The course was a clockwise rectangle. I had a pretty uneventful swim, and didn’t get stung by a jellyfish like last year. I think the swim was certainly a bit longer than 2010, but clearly I was slower too; coming out 15/22 in my age group and 136/355 overall. This was over 5 minutes slower than last year.
Exiting the water:
T1 – 1:35 (2010 – 2:17)
I knew looking at my watch that I was already way behind my time from last year, but at this point didn’t know if the swim was longer or if I was just slower. I had to get to work on making up time if I was going to get a better result than the prior year. I did have a quick transition, as it included a long run across the beach, getting out of the wetsuit, and out onto the bike. I remembered to take it easy on the damp boardwalk with my cycling shoes so I didn’t take a spill like last year.
Bike – 16.1 miles – 44:29, 21.7 mph (2010 – 47:23, 20.4 mph)
The bike course has some technical sections, including 16 90 degree turns and a short but pretty steep hill. I think the experience of riding the course before was helpful so I could meter my effort properly. I did have to take the corners slow but really focused on reeling in the faster swimmers on the straight sections.
Rounding one of the early corners:
Overall, I was very happy with the bike and knew I was making progress through the field and making up for lost time from the swim. I ended up with the 4th best bike split in my age group and 26th overall.
Motoring on one of the straightaways:
T2 – 0:46 (2010 – 1:00)
I came back to a relatively empty T2 and quickly got the running shoes on. T2 was 5th best in age group and 35th overall.
Run – 3.1 miles – 24:15, 7:49/mile (2010 – 25:16, 8:05/mile)
Run training was still not going well as I was nursing my groin strain, but I had managed 4 runs in the 2 weeks since Rhode Island – all less than 3.5 miles. I had a good run here last year and wanted to better the time.
Heading out of T2:
I had a pretty good run, but wasn’t feeling super fast. I had pulled myself through the field quite a bit on the bike and now the faster runners were putting some time into me on the run. I did a good job of keeping the HR pegged at right around 180 for most of the race. Nearing the finish I was close to 3 other runners and put in a big sprint to pass them on the line. One of the 3 was in my age group so it was worth the effort.
Running along the ocean in the second half of the run:
At the end, I couldn’t make up all the lost time on the swim and finished 25 seconds slower than 2010. I did have faster segments for every other discipline though. This resulted in better age group (36% vs 50%) and overall placings (14% vs 22%) this year.
2010 vs 2011 performance:
Final results:
| Time | Distance | Pace | AG Place | % | Overall Place | % | |
| # Entries | 22 | 355 | |||||
| Swim | 19:39 | 1/2 mile | 2:14/100yd | 15 | 68% | 136 | 38% |
| T1 | 1:34 | 10 | 45% | 81 | 23% | ||
| Bike | 44:29 | 16.1 miles | 21.7 mph | 4 | 18% | 26 | 7% |
| T2 | 0:46 | 5 | 23% | 35 | 10% | ||
| Run | 24:15 | 3.1 miles | 7:49/mile | 15 | 68% | 108 | 30% |
| Total | 1:30:41 | 8 | 36% | 51 | 14% |
Top 10 (I’m the red line):
Notice that I really lost no meaningful time against the winner on the bike or in either transition.
I also found this funny photo taken after the race as I was cooling down. This was my first race in the HEAT uniform. Got plenty of “Go Heat” from the spectators.
Read more...